The problem with modern hardware is that it’s impossible to know how expensive things are. A simple thing such as a memory access can mean an L1 cache hit, L2 cache hit, cache miss, or a page fault. Cost difference is 1000000 times.
This leads to a programming style when an engineer doesn’t know and doesn’t want to know what machine instructions his/her code will produce, and how much they will cost. This situation, which was normal in 90s when CPU speeds doubled every 2-3 years, nowadays is an obscure and crippling effect of Moore’s law.
A syscall which blocks, even momentarily, is bound to cost way more than a system call which doesn’t: a context switch not only has to do more work, it potentially thrashes L1/L2 cache, so is fraught with consequences.
Just to find out how much it may cost, my colleague
The result is 200000 writes to a pipe per second. Or, peak 100000 rps with 100% CPU utilization when handling a request involves working with some sort of device. For comparison, writing to a pipe which doesn’t block costs less than 1/12 of that.
Now, above is not just a funny example, it’s a puzzling example of a program which runs faster when the system has more work to do. Run the above test in multiple instances, and each instance gets a performance boost. So far I’ve been unable to rationally explain this part.